![]() On the one hand, it is nice that you are quite universal with the help of the motor mounts as far as the attachment to the printer and e.g. The type of mounting that I criticized and praised on the Hemera also remains on the Matrix. ![]() Is therefore an upgrade what I also for users of a standard V6 Hotends highly recommend. This alone contributes to a more consistent heat output due to the higher heat storage capacity. In addition, the Matrix is equipped with a Nickelplated-Copper-Heatblock instead of the simple aluminum heat block as well as a Plated-Copper-Nozzle contribution. The advantage of the titanium heatbrake, the better interruption of the heat transfer from heatblock to coldend, still remains. With other filament or comparable speeds with a 0.6 Nozzel, it would certainly look different. Whereas I tested the Matrix with up to 140mm/s at 5000mm/s² acceleration and had no problems at all, at least with the tested PLA. Of course, the criticism remains that you will have a problem for significantly higher filament throughput at very high speeds or large nozzle diameters. A titanium heatbrake is installed in the Matrix as standard. One of my biggest criticisms of the Hemera was the steel heatbrake, which is no longer available on the Matrix. ![]() G-R-E-A-T! Except for the weight, Trianglelab has improved a few things about the Hemera and at a much lower price. After I had owned the Matrix Extruder myself for a few weeks now and would like to share my opinion of this extruder with you here shortly. As mentioned in my post about the e3d Hemera, there is an extruder from Trianglelabs that is at least so similar to the Herema that I called it a clone in the other post. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |